Reproducibility of CRISPR-Cas9 methods for generation of conditional mouse alleles: a multi-center evaluation.
Clicks: 396
ID: 18835
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
84.2
/100
396 views
286 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #10 of 24 articles by views in Genome biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology has facilitated the generation of knockout mice, providing an alternative to cumbersome and time-consuming traditional embryonic stem cell-based methods. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout (cKO or floxed) alleles by microinjection of 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides as donors (referred herein as "two-donor floxing" method).We re-evaluate the two-donor method from a consortium of 20 laboratories across the world. The dataset constitutes 56 genetic loci, 17,887 zygotes, and 1718 live-born mice, of which only 15 (0.87%) mice contain cKO alleles. We subject the dataset to statistical analyses and a machine learning algorithm, which reveals that none of the factors analyzed was predictive for the success of this method. We test some of the newer methods that use one-donor DNA on 18 loci for which the two-donor approach failed to produce cKO alleles. We find that the one-donor methods are 10- to 20-fold more efficient than the two-donor approach.We propose that the two-donor method lacks efficiency because it relies on two simultaneous recombination events in cis, an outcome that is dwarfed by pervasive accompanying undesired editing events. The methods that use one-donor DNA are fairly efficient as they rely on only one recombination event, and the probability of correct insertion of the donor cassette without unanticipated mutational events is much higher. Therefore, one-donor methods offer higher efficiencies for the routine generation of cKO animal models.
| Reference Key |
gurumurthy2019reproducibilitygenome
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gurumurthy, Channabasavaiah B;O'Brien, Aidan R;Quadros, Rolen M;Adams, John;Alcaide, Pilar;Ayabe, Shinya;Ballard, Johnathan;Batra, Surinder K;Beauchamp, Marie-Claude;Becker, Kathleen A;Bernas, Guillaume;Brough, David;Carrillo-Salinas, Francisco;Chan, Wesley;Chen, Hanying;Dawson, Ruby;DeMambro, Victoria;D'Hont, Jinke;Dibb, Katharine M;Eudy, James D;Gan, Lin;Gao, Jing;Gonzales, Amy;Guntur, Anyonya R;Guo, Huiping;Harms, Donald W;Harrington, Anne;Hentges, Kathryn E;Humphreys, Neil;Imai, Shiho;Ishii, Hideshi;Iwama, Mizuho;Jonasch, Eric;Karolak, Michelle;Keavney, Bernard;Khin, Nay-Chi;Konno, Masamitsu;Kotani, Yuko;Kunihiro, Yayoi;Lakshmanan, Imayavaramban;Larochelle, Catherine;Lawrence, Catherine B;Li, Lin;Lindner, Volkhard;Liu, Xian-De;Lopez-Castejon, Gloria;Loudon, Andrew;Lowe, Jenna;Jerome-Majewska, Loydie A;Matsusaka, Taiji;Miura, Hiromi;Miyasaka, Yoshiki;Morpurgo, Benjamin;Motyl, Katherine;Nabeshima, Yo-Ichi;Nakade, Koji;Nakashiba, Toshiaki;Nakashima, Kenichi;Obata, Yuichi;Ogiwara, Sanae;Ouellet, Mariette;Oxburgh, Leif;Piltz, Sandra;Pinz, Ilka;Ponnusamy, Moorthy P;Ray, David;Redder, Ronald J;Rosen, Clifford J;Ross, Nikki;Ruhe, Mark T;Ryzhova, Larisa;Salvador, Ane M;Alam, Sabrina Shameen;Sedlacek, Radislav;Sharma, Karan;Smith, Chad;Staes, Katrien;Starrs, Lora;Sugiyama, Fumihiro;Takahashi, Satoru;Tanaka, Tomohiro;Trafford, Andrew W;Uno, Yoshihiro;Vanhoutte, Leen;Vanrockeghem, Frederique;Willis, Brandon J;Wright, Christian S;Yamauchi, Yuko;Yi, Xin;Yoshimi, Kazuto;Zhang, Xuesong;Zhang, Yu;Ohtsuka, Masato;Das, Satyabrata;Garry, Daniel J;Hochepied, Tino;Thomas, Paul;Parker-Thornburg, Jan;Adamson, Antony D;Yoshiki, Atsushi;Schmouth, Jean-Francois;Golovko, Andrei;Thompson, William R;Lloyd, K C Kent;Wood, Joshua A;Cowan, Mitra;Mashimo, Tomoji;Mizuno, Seiya;Zhu, Hao;Kasparek, Petr;Liaw, Lucy;Miano, Joseph M;Burgio, Gaetan; |
| Journal | Genome biology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1186/s13059-019-1776-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.