determinantes dos gastos com diálises no sistema Único de saúde, brasil, 2000 a 2004 determinants of expenditures on dialysis in the unified national health system, brazil, 2000 to 2004
Clicks: 294
ID: 187879
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
294 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #105 of 587 articles by views in iberian conference on information systems and technologies, cisti
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 587 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O objetivo deste estudo é comparar os gastos ambulatoriais totais entre hemodiálise e diálise peritoneal, de 2000 a 2004, dos pacientes que iniciaram diálise, em 2000, no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Foi desenvolvida coorte histórica de pacientes que iniciaram diálise em 2000, identificados por pareamento probabilístico na base de dados de Autorização de Procedimentos de Alta Complexidade/Custo (APAC). Utilizou-se modelo de regressão linear múltipla incluindo atributos individuais, clínicos e variáveis de oferta de serviços de saúde. A coorte foi constituída por 10.899 pacientes, 88,5% iniciaram em hemodiálise, e 11,5%, em diálise peritoneal. A modalidade explica 12% da variância dos gastos, os pacientes em diálise peritoneal apresentam um gasto médio anual 20% maior. Os diferenciais nos gastos são explicados pelo estado da federação e nível de oferta de serviços de saúde. As variáveis de risco individual não alteram o poder de explicação do modelo, sendo significativos a idade e a presença de diabetes mellitus. Constata-se a importância do sistema de pagamento do SUS para explicar as diferenças de gastos do tratamento dialítico no Brasil.
The aim of this study was to compare total outpatient expenditures on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis from 2000 to 2004 in patients that began dialysis in 2000 under the Unified National Health System (SUS). A historical cohort was developed, consisting of patients that began dialysis in 2000, identified by probabilistic matching in the database of Authorizations for High-Complexity/High-Cost Procedures (APAC). A multiple linear regression model was used, including individual and clinical attributes and health services supply variables. The cohort included 10,899 patients, 88.5% of whom began hemodialysis and 11.5% peritoneal dialysis. The dialysis modality explains 12% of the variance in expenditures, and patients in peritoneal dialysis showed 20% higher mean annual expenditure. The differences in expenditures are explained according to the State of Brazil and health services supply level. Individual risk variables did not alter the model's explanatory power, while age and diabetes mellitus were significant. The study showed the importance of the National Health System's payment mechanism for explaining differences in expenditures on dialysis treatment in Brazil.
The aim of this study was to compare total outpatient expenditures on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis from 2000 to 2004 in patients that began dialysis in 2000 under the Unified National Health System (SUS). A historical cohort was developed, consisting of patients that began dialysis in 2000, identified by probabilistic matching in the database of Authorizations for High-Complexity/High-Cost Procedures (APAC). A multiple linear regression model was used, including individual and clinical attributes and health services supply variables. The cohort included 10,899 patients, 88.5% of whom began hemodialysis and 11.5% peritoneal dialysis. The dialysis modality explains 12% of the variance in expenditures, and patients in peritoneal dialysis showed 20% higher mean annual expenditure. The differences in expenditures are explained according to the State of Brazil and health services supply level. Individual risk variables did not alter the model's explanatory power, while age and diabetes mellitus were significant. The study showed the importance of the National Health System's payment mechanism for explaining differences in expenditures on dialysis treatment in Brazil.
| Reference Key |
cherchiglia2010cadernosdeterminantes
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mariangela Leal Cherchiglia;Isabel Cristina Gomes;Juliana Alvares;Augusto Guerra Júnior;Francisco de Assis Acúrcio;Eli Iola Gurgel Andrade;Alessandra Maciel Almeida;Daniele Araújo Campo Szuster;Mônica Viegas Andrade;Odilon Vanni de Queiroz |
| Journal | iberian conference on information systems and technologies, cisti |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0102-311X2010000800016
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.