Development and comparison of migration paths for smart grids using two case studies.

Clicks: 324
ID: 185612
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #119 of 235 articles by views in Heliyon

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 235 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Due to the energy turnaround in German politics, it is necessary to integrate more and more wind and solar energy into the existing energy system. In particular, power generation is changing from a previously centralized to a decentralized structure, which also has consequences for requirements for safe, reliable and efficient grid operation. Generation and utilization characteristics will become more dynamic and flexible in the future. Increased demand for the measurement, control and automation of voltage and electricity will require the further development of grid infrastructure, the expansion of storage capacity and the introduction of information and communication technology (ICT)-based energy management (Appelrath et al., 2012). Utilities therefore need to know what migration paths into the future of a smart energy grid could look like. And this against the background of which technologies have to be installed, in which order this can happen and which dependencies have to be considered. The aim is to create roadmaps to the modern Smart Grid for two case studies. Within the framework of the Green Access project (Projekt Green Access, 2019), and (Flore & Kumm, 2020), a maturity model and, based on this, migration paths were developed for this purpose, which describe a path from one development stage to the next. It describes the necessary development steps that have to be implemented in the context of migration paths. These migration paths have been developed for a specially designed maturity model and describe the technologies used to move from one maturity level to the next. Finally, there will be a comparison of the developed migration paths of the two case studies.
Reference Key
flore2020developmentheliyon Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Flore, Agnetha;Marx Gómez, Jorge;
Journal Heliyon
Year 2020
DOI
10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04913
URL
Keywords
Environmental Science Evaluation environmental engineering energy case study electrical engineering smart grids environmental economics information systems maturity models migration paths

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.