retrospective evaluation of outcomes in lumbar disc surgery with spinal anesthesia
Clicks: 169
ID: 184444
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
169 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #48 of 61 articles by views in journal of solid state chemistry
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: We investigated feasibility, possible advantages and disadvantages of spinal anesthesia in lomber disc surgery.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 100 patients operated for elective lomber spinal surgery under spinal anesthesia.
Results: Spinal anesthesia was sufficient for lumbar disc surgery in 97 of 100 patients. Three patients received general anesthesia due to insufficient spinal block. Allergic reaction was observed in one patient receiving general anesthesia, and treated with intravenous steroid and antihistaminic drugs. We observed bradycardia and hypotension necessitating ephedrine administration in eight patients, post dural puncture headache in 10 patients (two patients were discharged at 4 and 7 days later therefore), who received spinal anesthesia. Following spinal anesthesia, patients required first analgesic at 10th hour. Patients receiving general anesthesia demanded first analgesic in the post operative care unit.
Conclusion: We are of the opinion that spinal anesthesia may be safely used in lumbar disc surgeries, provided that patients are not positioned until sufficient anxiolytic and spinal block are established. J Clin Exp Invest 2014; 5 (1): 54-58
| Reference Key |
kksal2014journalretrospective
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Vaner Köksal;Ahmet Şen;Başar Erdivanlı;Bülent Özdemir |
| Journal | journal of solid state chemistry |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.5799/ahinjs.01.2014.01.0359
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.