reconstruction of indigenous forests planning policy in way kanan regency following the ruling of the constitutional court on traditional forestpung city)

Clicks: 154
ID: 184347
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #20 of 39 articles by views in kennedy institute of ethics journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Constitutional Court Decision No.35/ PUU-X/2012 restored the function of indigenous forests to be managed by the indigenous peoples. The ruling establishes that indigenous forest is no longer a part of the state forest but part of the forest rights. Forest rights no longer only include forests on lands of natural / legal entity but also are located in the area of indigenous peoples. The problem in this research is how the reconstruction of indigenous forest planning policy in Way Kanan regency after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 35 / PUU-X / 2012 on Traditional Forest. The research used here is normative juridical-empirical. The data used is secondary data and primary data, then is performed by juridical qualitative data analysis. Based on the research results, the arrangement of indigenous forests done by Way Kanan District Government is started from the assistance and mediator, data collection, research conduct and the confirmation of the existence of customary law communities along with indigenous areas, cooperating with the partnership between indigenous peoples and the concessionaires of Forest Management Rights (HPH), and accelerate the formation Regional Regulation on the Recognition of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous forest planning policy was blocked because Way Kanan Regional Regulation that specifically related to customary law communities has not been established, there is something confusing associated with the administration of indigenous forests and the intervention of interests of the party holding Forest Management Rights (HPH).   Keyword: Reconstruction, Regulation, Indigenous Forest
Reference Key
pane2017fiatreconstruction Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Erina Pane
Journal kennedy institute of ethics journal
Year 2017
DOI
10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no1.904
URL
http://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat/article/view/904
Keywords
jurisprudence comparative and uniform law law in general

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.