cluster–staff search coil magnetometer calibration – comparisons with fgm
Clicks: 158
ID: 183388
2014
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
158 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #28 of 35 articles by views in radiologic technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The main part of the Cluster Spatio-Temporal
Analysis of Field Fluctuations (STAFF) experiment consists of triaxial search
coils allowing the measurements of the three magnetic components of the waves
from 0.1 Hz up to 4 kHz. Two sets of data are produced, one by a module to
filter and transmit the corresponding waveform up to either 10 or 180 Hz
(STAFF-SC), and the second by the onboard Spectrum Analyser (STAFF-SA) to
compute the elements of the spectral matrix for five components of the waves,
3 × B and 2 × E (from the EFW experiment), in the
frequency range 8 Hz to 4 kHz.
In order to understand the way the output signals of the search coils are calibrated, the transfer functions of the different parts of the instrument are described as well as the way to transform telemetry data into physical units across various coordinate systems from the spinning sensors to a fixed and known frame. The instrument sensitivity is discussed. Cross-calibration inside STAFF (SC and SA) is presented. Results of cross-calibration between the STAFF search coils and the Cluster Fluxgate Magnetometer (FGM) data are discussed. It is shown that these cross-calibrations lead to an agreement between both data sets at low frequency within a 2% error. By means of statistics done over 10 yr, it is shown that the functionalities and characteristics of both instruments have not changed during this period.
In order to understand the way the output signals of the search coils are calibrated, the transfer functions of the different parts of the instrument are described as well as the way to transform telemetry data into physical units across various coordinate systems from the spinning sensors to a fixed and known frame. The instrument sensitivity is discussed. Cross-calibration inside STAFF (SC and SA) is presented. Results of cross-calibration between the STAFF search coils and the Cluster Fluxgate Magnetometer (FGM) data are discussed. It is shown that these cross-calibrations lead to an agreement between both data sets at low frequency within a 2% error. By means of statistics done over 10 yr, it is shown that the functionalities and characteristics of both instruments have not changed during this period.
| Reference Key |
robert2014geoscientificcluster–staff
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;P. Robert;N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin;R. Piberne;Y. de Conchy;C. Lacombe;V. Bouzid;B. Grison;D. Alison;P. Canu |
| Journal | radiologic technology |
| Year | 2014 |
| DOI |
10.5194/gi-3-153-2014
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.