warranties arising from procedural rules and european jurisprudence in administrative order

Clicks: 222
ID: 182625
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #13 of 58 articles by views in current diabetes reviews

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Amongst the rules applicable in administrative dispute, those created from the European Convention for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms should particularly be emphasised. Similarly, administrative adjudication has accepted, after the Council of State’s decision on October 20, 1989 in the Nicolo case, to supervise harmonisation of national law and a certain agreement, namely the European Union Association Agreement. This has resulted in self interpretation of the agreement. In resolving various issues, the administrative judge was forced to follow Strasbourg court practice. Therefore, finally, as a logical conclusion, the question arises of: Is national law being europeanised or is European law becoming “nationalised?”
Reference Key
gohin2013zbornikwarranties Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Olivier Gohin
Journal current diabetes reviews
Year 2013
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/152557
Keywords
administration

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.