learners' and native speakers' use of recurrent word-combinations across disciplines

Clicks: 266
ID: 180660
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 11 articles by views in brill's journal of afroasiatic languages and linguistics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper compares the use of recurrent word-combinations (n-grams) in texts produced by Norwegian learners of English and native speakers of English in two academic disciplines, namely linguistics and business. The study explores the extent to which the same n-grams are used by learners and native speakers in the two disciplines. Using an adapted version of Moon's (1998) functional framework, we map the functions of the n-grams, distinguishing between three major functions: ideational/informational, interpersonal and textual. The ngrams are extracted from the VESPA and BAWE corpora, representing learner and native language, respectively. The data reveal a complex picture. Informational n-grams are by far the most frequent type and they seem to be not only discipline-specific, but also topic-specific. There are more n-grams with an interpersonal function (evaluative and modalizing) in the linguistics than in the business discipline. Frequencies of n-grams with a textual/organizational function are more similar across the material. However, there is relatively little overlap in the use of individual n-grams with interpersonal and textual functions across the L1 groups. There is a higher degree of similarity between learners and native speakers in the linguistics discipline than in the business discipline. On the other hand, there is some similarity across disciplines within L1 groups as regards interpersonal and textual n-grams.
Reference Key
ebeling2015bergenlearners' Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Signe Oksefjell Ebeling;Hilde Hasselgård
Journal brill's journal of afroasiatic languages and linguistics
Year 2015
DOI
10.15845/bells.v6i0.810
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.