knowledge and experience of physiotherapists on non-invasive ventilation - doi:10.5020/18061230.2011.p214
Clicks: 288
ID: 179896
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
77.5
/100
288 views
240 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #28 of 130 articles by views in food research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 130 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: To compare knowledge and experience in non-invasive ventilation (NIV) among physiotherapists of hospital wards and adult Intensive Care Units (ICU). Methods: A study conducted from August/2007 to August/ 2008, in four public hospitals in Fortaleza-CE, Brazil, with 116 physiotherapists (42/wards and 76/ICU) on their practical and theoretical knowledge on NIV, with open and closed questions. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics through SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 17. Results: Regarding the use of NIV, 22 of 42 physiotherapists from the wards and one of 74 from the ICU never administered it (p<0.05); 19 (45%) of physiotherapists from the wards and 58 (78%) from the ICU answered correctly on NIV as first choice; 18 (43%) physiotherapists from the wards and 64 (86%) from the ICU answered properly on physiological effects (p<0.05); 21 (50%) physiotherapists from the wards and 68 (92%) from the ICU answered appropriately on indications of NIV (p <0.05); 19 (45%) physiotherapists from wards and 71 (96%) from ICU answered correctly on contraindications of NIV (p <0.05); 8 (19%) physiotherapists in the wards and 36 (49%) in the ICU considered infrastructure satisfactory. In the ICU, 68 (92%) physiotherapists believed they were able to monitor NIV, in wards 13 (31%) did it (p <0.05). Conclusions: Physiotherapists of the ICU showed more experience regarding the administration of NIV; they had the knowledge and believed they were more apt to use it than those of the wards. As the physiotherapist is directly involved in this therapeutics, the knowledge and practice of NIV can be better exploited in the ICU and wards.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (90 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
santiago2012revistaknowledge
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Isabel Cristina de Mendonça Santiago;Fabíola Maria Sabino Meireles;Cymara Pessoa Kuehner;Mirizana Alves de Almeida |
| Journal | food research |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.5020/2074
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.