the acquisition of l2 english non-null arguments by l1 thai learners

Clicks: 151
ID: 176637
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #13 of 17 articles by views in computers and electronics in agriculture

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The study explored the acquisition of L2 English non-null arguments by L1 Thai learners, that is, whether they were able to recognize and correct sentences with null arguments. Two variables which presumably affected the acquisition, namely clause types and prepositional phrases (PPs), were employed. A grammaticality judgment task (GJT) was administered to 31 intermediate and 31 advanced undergraduate L1 Thai students. The results suggested that sensitivity to recognize null arguments increased with higher proficiency. Paired-samples t-tests were performed to determine whether the two variables affected the acquisition. For the intermediate group, it was found that both clause types and PPs affected their judgments. We propose that perceptual salience could account for the intermediate participants' preference for null embedded subjects over null matrix subjects and that the lack of argument/adjunct knowledge could account for the intermediate participants' preference for null object sentences followed by a PP over null object sentences without a PP following. For the advanced group, it was found that clause types affected their judgment. We propose that informal styles of communication influenced the advanced participants' preference for null matrix subjects.
Reference Key
namtapi2016kasetsartthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Itsara Namtapi;Nattama Pongpairoj
Journal computers and electronics in agriculture
Year 2016
DOI
10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.011
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.