banking rating in romania. a comparative analysis between caampl and perlas models
Clicks: 230
ID: 176323
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
230 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #39 of 97 articles by views in kastamonu eğitim dergisi
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this paper the author presents the evaluation method of the crediting risk in 20 Romanian banks, based on the
unique rating systems called CAAMPL and PERLAS models. The content of each component of this system is taken into
consideration and also the group of values attached to every component of credit risk analysis is highlighted. Finally, the
main measures that a bank has to take in order to limit credit risk are presented.
| Reference Key |
lucian2016analelebanking
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;GĂBAN LUCIAN |
| Journal | kastamonu eğitim dergisi |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.