escarificação mecânica e biológica para a redução da compactação em argissolo franco-arenoso sob plantio direto mechanical and biological chiseling to reduce compaction of a sandy loam alfisol under no-tillage
Clicks: 179
ID: 175505
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
179 views
46 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #130 of 201 articles by views in Revista de saude publica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O manejo influi nas propriedades físicas no campo, alterando a dinâmica do ar, da água e de solutos no solo. Propriedades físicas em sistemas de manejo conservacionista do solo foram avaliadas em um Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo distrófico arênico (Typic Hapludalf) de textura franco-arenosa no horizonte A. Os tratamentos foram estabelecidos em solo com histórico de 10 anos de plantio direto, a saber: soja em sistema plantio direto; soja em solo escarificado; crotalária em cultivo mínimo e solo descoberto sem preparo. Foram determinadas: a resistência mecânica à penetração; a densidade do solo; a porosidade total; a distribuição do tamanho de poros; a condutividade hidráulica do solo saturado e não saturado; a infiltração de água no solo pelos métodos de anéis concêntricos e sob chuva natural; a variação da umidade volumétrica do solo durante o ciclo das culturas e a curva característica de água no solo. Observou-se que a resistência mecânica à penetração (RP) foi máxima na camada de 0,075 m, nos tratamentos sem preparo do solo, enquanto, no solo escarificado (Esc-soja), a RP máxima ocorreu em maior profundidade (0,175 m). A mobilização subsuperficial (escarificação) e a superficial (discagem e semeadura) do solo não se refletiram em redução na densidade do solo (Ds). O solo sob plantio direto de soja apresentou maior volume de macroporos que o solo sob cultivo de crotalária e descoberto, na profundidade 0,02 a 0,05 m, favorecendo a maior condutividade hidráulica do solo saturado e a menor retenção de água no solo em situação de déficit hídrico. Dentre as propriedades físico-mecânicas analisadas, a RP mostrou-se mais sensível em detectar a compactação do que a Ds e porosidades, especialmente para camadas de solo pouco espessas. A eficácia da ruptura da camada compactada do solo depende da propriedade hídrica ou mecânica do solo usada como indicadora. Usando a condutividade hidráulica do solo saturado, em médio prazo, a "escarificação biológica" (CM-crot) mostrou-se mais eficaz na ruptura da camada compactada e estabelecimento de poros condutores de água do que a escarificação mecânica (Esc-soja) do solo. Em contrapartida, se o indicador for a RP, o resultado é inverso. Assim, a propriedade hídrica ou mecânica do solo a ser usada como indicadora para a avaliação da eficácia da ruptura da camada compactada do solo depende do processo físico priorizado: a infiltração e redistribuição de água ou a penetração e crescimento de raízes.
Soil management alters the physical soil properties and changes the soil air, water, and solute dynamics. Physical soil properties as affected by conservationist soil management systems were studied in a sandy loam Typic Hapludalf. The treatments were established on a soil that has been under no-tillage for 10 years, and consisted of: no-tillage soybeans, chisel tillage soybeans, reduced tillage Crotalaria, and bare soil without tillage. The evaluated soil properties were soil penetration resistance, bulk density, porosity, pore size distribution, saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, water infiltration using concentric rings or natural rainfall, variation of the volumetric soil moisture throughout the cropping cycle, and water retention curve. Soil penetration resistance (PR) was highest at 0.075 m and 0.175 m depth in no-tillage and chiseled soil, respectively. Soil subsurface mobilization with chiseling and surface mobilization due to disking and sowing did not influence the bulk density (BD) after the crop harvest. No-till soil under soybean crop had greater macroporosity than reduced tillage crotalaria and bare soil at 0.02 to 0.05 m depth, resulting in a greater saturated hydraulic conductivity and lower water retention during periods of low water availability. Among the analyzed soil physical-mechanical properties, PR seemed to be more sensitive to detect soil compaction than BD or porosities, particularly for thinner soil layers. The effectiveness in rupturing compacted soil depended on the hydraulic or mechanical soil property used as indicator. When using K(thetas) as indicator, in the medium term (4.5 months), "biological chiseling" by Crotalaria roots was more efficient at ameliorating soil compaction and establishing a network of conductive pores compared to mechanical chiseling. However, inverse results were observed when PR was used as indicator. Thus, the choice of a soil physical property as indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of compaction reduction depends on which physical process is considered more important: water infiltration and redistribution or root penetration and growth.
Soil management alters the physical soil properties and changes the soil air, water, and solute dynamics. Physical soil properties as affected by conservationist soil management systems were studied in a sandy loam Typic Hapludalf. The treatments were established on a soil that has been under no-tillage for 10 years, and consisted of: no-tillage soybeans, chisel tillage soybeans, reduced tillage Crotalaria, and bare soil without tillage. The evaluated soil properties were soil penetration resistance, bulk density, porosity, pore size distribution, saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, water infiltration using concentric rings or natural rainfall, variation of the volumetric soil moisture throughout the cropping cycle, and water retention curve. Soil penetration resistance (PR) was highest at 0.075 m and 0.175 m depth in no-tillage and chiseled soil, respectively. Soil subsurface mobilization with chiseling and surface mobilization due to disking and sowing did not influence the bulk density (BD) after the crop harvest. No-till soil under soybean crop had greater macroporosity than reduced tillage crotalaria and bare soil at 0.02 to 0.05 m depth, resulting in a greater saturated hydraulic conductivity and lower water retention during periods of low water availability. Among the analyzed soil physical-mechanical properties, PR seemed to be more sensitive to detect soil compaction than BD or porosities, particularly for thinner soil layers. The effectiveness in rupturing compacted soil depended on the hydraulic or mechanical soil property used as indicator. When using K(thetas) as indicator, in the medium term (4.5 months), "biological chiseling" by Crotalaria roots was more efficient at ameliorating soil compaction and establishing a network of conductive pores compared to mechanical chiseling. However, inverse results were observed when PR was used as indicator. Thus, the choice of a soil physical property as indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of compaction reduction depends on which physical process is considered more important: water infiltration and redistribution or root penetration and growth.
| Reference Key |
abreu2004revistaescarificao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | Revista de saude publica |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0100-06832004000300013
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Your session, form security (XSRF) and this choice; if you came through a member's referral link, its code for 30 days (referral_token). Journament's own cookies only.
Google Analytics 4 (Google LLC, USA): measures which pages are visited; the _ga and _ga_* cookies are kept for up to 2 years.
Google AdSense (Google LLC, USA): shows, measures and may personalise ads on journal, article and home pages; the __gads, __gpi and __eoi cookies are kept for up to 13 months.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.