solving the ttc 2011 reengineering case with edapt
Clicks: 117
ID: 175243
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
117 views
17 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #79 of 102 articles by views in ama journal of ethics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper gives an overview of the Edapt solution to the reengineering case of the Transformation Tool Contest 2011.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (18 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
herrmannsdoerfer2011electronicsolving
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Markus Herrmannsdoerfer |
| Journal | ama journal of ethics |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
10.4204/EPTCS.74.14
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.