the review of decisions issued by the administrative court, as per art. 21 paragraph (2) in law no. 554/2004. admissibility conditions
Clicks: 278
ID: 174631
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
278 views
36 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 83 articles by views in Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
By this paper, using the observation method, we proposed an identification of the admissibilityconditions for the review claim based on the provisions of art. 21 paragraph (1) in Law no. 554/2004. On oneside, we considered as necessary to elaborate this study as a consequence of the Romanian ConstitutionalCourt decisions for solving the unconstitutionality pleas regarding this law provision, and on the other sidewe approached this subject considering the interpretable nature of the respective provision. From anotherpoint of view, we appreciated that a clarifying of “EU law preference principle breaching” formula content isrequired, the same being included in the provision mentioned above. Specifically, we tried to find out whetherthe respective formula can be taken as basis for a review claim based on the provisions of art. 21 paragraph(1) in Law no. 554/2004 in case a fundamental human rights breach is invoked, referring to Lisbon Treatyprovisions. By this paper we showed the deficiencies of the enactment as it is in force (also signaling thedeficiencies to be found in the modification proposal).
| Reference Key |
rosu2011eirpthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Angelica Rosu;Petrina Simona Gavrila |
| Journal | Вестник Донского государственного технического университета |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.