ecocardiografia por doppler tecidual no diagnóstico de rejeição após transplante cardíaco ecocardiografía con doppler tisular en el diagnóstico de rechazo después de transplante cardíaco tissue doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of heart transplantation rejection
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #33 of 230 articles by views in revista cubana de ciencias informáticas
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 230 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
FUNDAMENTO: La biopsia endomiocárdica (BEM) es el método gold standard para el diagnóstico de rechazo celular (RC) después de transplante cardíaco (TC). OBJETIVO: Testear la hipótesis de que el examen de imagen con Doppler tisular (IDT) puede detectar RC > 3A y agregar información diagnóstica, comparado al Doppler convencional. MÉTODOS: Cincuenta y cuatro pacientes con TC fueron sometidos a BEM y estudio ecocardiográfico a través de IDT en hasta 24 horas. Comparamos los pacientes con TC y RC > 3A con pacientes con TC y RC < 3A, con un grupo control normal (13 pacientes). Fueron medidas a través de la IDT, las velocidades sistólica (S), diastólica precoz (e`), diastólica tardía (a') relación de las velocidades e'/a' en el anillo ventricular izquierdo, en los segmentos basal y medio de las paredes septal (SEP), lateral (LAT), inferior (INF) y en el anillo ventricular derecho. RESULTADOS: Los pacientes con TC mostraron RC > 3A en 39/129 (30,2%) de las BEM. El mejor predictor aislado para el diagnóstico de RC fue la a'LAT, con sensibilidad de 76,3%, especificidad de 73,8% (p = 0,001). En el análisis multivariado, la a'LAT (p = 0,001), a'SEP (p = 0,002), relación e'/a' LAT (p = 0,006), relación e'Mitral/e'LAT (p = 0,014), SINF (p = 0,009) fueron predictores de RC > 3A. Obtuvimos un escore con sensibilidad de 88,2%, precisión de 79,6%, y valor predictivo negativo de 92.9% para diagnosticar RC > 3A . El Doppler convencional (flujo mitral y pulmonar venoso) no fue relevante para predecir la RC > 3A. CONCLUSIÓN: El estudio de IDT agregó información diagnóstica para predecir RC > 3A cuando fue comparado al Doppler convencional. El modelo basado en IDT puede volverse un método en potencial para detectar RC > 3A después de TC.
BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of cellular rejection (CR) after heart transplantation (HT). OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) could detect CR > 3A and add diagnostic information compared to conventional Doppler. METHODS: Fifty-four HT patients underwent 129 EMB and a TDI echocardiographic study within 24 hours. We compared HT patients with CR > 3A versus HT patients with CR < 3A, with a normal matched control group (13 patients). We measured TDI systolic (S), early diastolic (e'), late diastolic (a') velocities and e'/a' ratio in the left ventricular annulus, basal and medium (mid) segments of the septal (SEP), lateral (LAT), inferior (INF), anterior (ANT) walls; and in the right ventricular annulus. RESULTS: HT patients showed CR > 3A in 39/129 (30.2%) EMB. The best isolated predictor for CR diagnosis was a'LAT, with a sensitivity of 76.3%, specificity of 73.8% (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, a'LAT (p = 0.001), a'SEP (p = 0.002), e'/a' LAT ratio (p = 0.006), e'Mitral/ e'LAT ratio (p = 0.014), SINF (p = 0.009) predicted CR > 3A. We obtained a score with a sensitivity of 88.2%, accuracy of 79.6% and negative predictive value of 92.9% to diagnose CR > 3A. Conventional Doppler (mitral and pulmonary venous flow) was not relevant to predict CR > 3A. CONCLUSION: TDI added diagnostic information to predict CR > 3A compared to conventional Doppler. A TDI-based model could become a potential method to detect CR > 3A after Heart Transplantation.
| Reference Key |
resende2011arquivosecocardiografia
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Marcos Valério Coimbra Resende;Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira;Fernando Bacal;José Lázaro Andrade;Noedir A. Stolf;Edmar Alcides Bocchi |
| Journal | revista cubana de ciencias informáticas |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.