efeitos de dopamina e noradrenalina no fluxo sangüíneo regional no tratamento do choque séptico dopamine and noradrenaline effects in the blood flux regional on therapeutic in the septic shock
Clicks: 310
ID: 174353
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
310 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #19 of 66 articles by views in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A noradrenalina e a dopamina são utilizadas, no estado de choque, com o intuito de oferecer suporte hemodinâmico e restabelecer a perfusão tecidual. As ações farmacológicas desses vasopressores podem ser variadas, deste modo, o uso necessita, por parte do clinico, interpretação dos efeitos hemodinâmicos, com observação das variáveis sistêmica e regional. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar as publicações acerca dos efeitos da noradrenalina e dopamina em baixas doses na perfusão hepatoesplâncnica e renal no tratamento do choque séptico. MÉTODO: Foram selecionados artigos (n = 27) sobre o uso de noradrenalina e dopamina em choque séptico, publicados no período de 1997 a setembro de 2007 revisados na PubMed, base de dados da National Library of Medicine (NLM). Utilizou-se o recurso MESH com os descritores noradrenaline, dopamine e sepsis. RESULTADOS: Os efeitos de dopamina e noradrenalina na perfusão renal demonstraram ser semelhantes em relação ao aumento da diurese e não alteração na depuração de creatinina. A noradrenalina não afetou a perfusão tissular renal, apesar de elevar o tônus vascular. Quanto aos efeitos esplâncnicos, os dois fármacos demonstraram aumentar o fluxo sangüíneo, porém redistribuem o sangue nesse compartimento. CONCLUSÕES: Os estudos analisados foram controversos não demonstrando consenso acerca do fármaco mais oportuno para o restabelecimento hemodinâmico e manutenção de perfusão regional adequada.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Norepinephrine and dopamine are used, in the state of shock, with the intention of offering hemodynamic support and to reestablish tissue perfusion. The pharmacological effects of these vasopressors can be diverse, for this reason, their use requires, through the clinician, an interpretation of the hemodynamic effects with observation of the systemic variations and region. With this in mind, the objective of this study was to analyze the publications regarding the effects of norepinephrine and low-dose dopamine in hepatosplenic perfusion and renal in treatment of septic shock. METHODS: Articles were selected (n = 27) concerning the use of norepinephrine and dopamine in septic shock, published during the period of 1997 to September 2007, revised in PubMed, data base of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). The MESH method was utilized with the descriptors norepinephrine, dopamine and sepsis. RESULTS: The effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in kidney perfusion are similar; there is an increase in diuresis and no change in creatinine clearance. Norepinephrine did not affect kidney tissue perfusion in spite of the increase of vascular tone. Regarding the splancnic effects, these drugs showed an increase in blood flow, though redistributing the blood in this compartment. CONCLUSIONS: The best agent for the hemodynamic reestablishment that keeps the adequate regional perfusion remains inconclusive.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Norepinephrine and dopamine are used, in the state of shock, with the intention of offering hemodynamic support and to reestablish tissue perfusion. The pharmacological effects of these vasopressors can be diverse, for this reason, their use requires, through the clinician, an interpretation of the hemodynamic effects with observation of the systemic variations and region. With this in mind, the objective of this study was to analyze the publications regarding the effects of norepinephrine and low-dose dopamine in hepatosplenic perfusion and renal in treatment of septic shock. METHODS: Articles were selected (n = 27) concerning the use of norepinephrine and dopamine in septic shock, published during the period of 1997 to September 2007, revised in PubMed, data base of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). The MESH method was utilized with the descriptors norepinephrine, dopamine and sepsis. RESULTS: The effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in kidney perfusion are similar; there is an increase in diuresis and no change in creatinine clearance. Norepinephrine did not affect kidney tissue perfusion in spite of the increase of vascular tone. Regarding the splancnic effects, these drugs showed an increase in blood flow, though redistributing the blood in this compartment. CONCLUSIONS: The best agent for the hemodynamic reestablishment that keeps the adequate regional perfusion remains inconclusive.
| Reference Key |
miranda2008revistaefeitos
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Milena Penteado Ferraro Miranda;Francisco Garcia Soriano;Silvia Regina Secoli |
| Journal | Database : the journal of biological databases and curation |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S0103-507X2008000100008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.