attainment of international legal status on the part of the republic of croatia (25th june 1991)
Clicks: 221
ID: 173275
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
221 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #12 of 58 articles by views in current diabetes reviews
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The emergence of the Republic of Croatia as a subject of the international law cannot be considered exclusively in the context of its international recognition. Croatia emerged as an international law subject upon proclamation of its own independence and, thus, as all sovereign states, attained all rights and duties with regard to its territory. The attainment of both the sovereignty and international status on the Croatian part can, therefore, be considered in the context of the efficiency of the exercise of the sovereign state authority.
In the author's view, the Republic of Croatia emerged as the subject of the international law on 25th June 1991, following the enactment of the constitution acts on sovereignty and autonomy, implicit independence, which resulted directly from factual efficiency of the sovereign state authority.
Having signed the Brijuni agreement on 7th July 1991, the President of the Republic of Croatia assumed the international obligation to defer the enactment of constitution acts for a period of three months. The Croatian Parliament, however, never ratified the agreement, although the decision concerning ratification was within its exclusive jurisdiction.
This very act of not ratifying the agreement actually represents the conflict between the international legal obligation and internal law. The text writer believe that the very enactment of the agreement was indeed deferred, thus giving preference to the international law.
The constitution acts that were passed on 25th June 1991 remained in force notwithstanding the Brijuni declaration. There are two different theories on the effects that the declaration had on the international legal status of Croatia. According to the first one, Croatia lost its international status or, in other words, ceased to be the subject of the international law: the effect of the constitution acts was, thus, annulled. Croatia once again regained its previous status of a federal unit within the Social Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY).
According to the second theory, however, the Republic of Croatia emerged as a sovereign and independent republic, as proclaimed on 25th June. Its sovereignty is, therefore, continuous and indubitable.
| Reference Key |
rudolf2013zbornikattainment
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Davorin Rudolf |
| Journal | current diabetes reviews |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.