avaliação do diagnóstico da sepse neonatal: uso de parâmetros laboratoriais e clínicos como fatores diagnósticos evaluación del diagnóstico de sepsis neonatal: uso de parámetros laboratoriales y clínicos como factores diagnósticos evaluation of the neonatal sepsis diagnosis: use of clinical and laboratory parameters as diagnosis factors

Clicks: 319
ID: 170094
2011
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #47 of 229 articles by views in FEMS microbiology letters

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 229 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Objetivou-se descrever e comparar as características clínicas, laboratoriais e assistenciais de RN que apresentaram sepse comprovada tardia e de RN que apresentaram sepse não comprovada tardia. Em seguida, avaliar se houve diferença entre os grupos, além de descrever os germes prevalentes na unidade neonatal estudada. Estudo descritivo, envolvendo 168 casos. Observou-se que 33,3% tiveram sepse tardia provada. A idade no momento da sepse, o tempo total de internação, a quantidade total de neutrófilos, a quantidade de neutrófilos imaturos e o valor da PC-r mostraram bons parâmetros na diferenciação entre os dois grupos quando analisados de forma isolada. A Klebisiella pneumoniae, o Staphylococcus coagulase negativo e o S. aureus foram as bactérias mais comumente isoladas.
Se objetivó describir y comparar las características clínicas, laboratoriales y asistenciales de RN que presentaron sepsis comprobada tardía y de RN que presentaron sepsis no comprobada tardía para, entonces, evaluar si hubo diferencia entre los grupos, además de describir los gérmenes prevalentes en la unidad neonatal estudiada. Estudio descriptivo, involucrando 168 casos, 33,3% tuvieron sepsis tardía probada. La edad al momento de la sepsis, el tiempo total de internación, la cantidad total de neutrófilos, la cantidad de neutrófilos inmaduros y el valor de la PC-r mostraron buenos parámetros en la diferenciación entre los dos grupos cuando fueron analizados en forma aislada. La Klebsiella pneumoniae, el Staphylococcus coagulase negativo y el S. aureus fueron las bacterias aisladas con mayor prevalencia.
The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the clinical, laboratory and health care characteristics of newborns (NBs) with confirmed late onset sepsis and NBs with unconfirmed late sepsis, verify if there were any differences between the groups, and describe the germs prevalent in the studied neonatal unit. This is a descriptive study, involving 168 cases. It was observer that 33.3% had a confirmed diagnosis for late onset sepsis. The age at the time of sepsis onset, the length of stay, the total number of neutrophils, the number of immature neutrophils and the value of PC-r proved good parameters to differentiate between the two groups when analyzed separately. The most common isolated bacteria were: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus coagulase negative and S. aureus.
Reference Key
meireles2011revistaavaliao Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Luciano de Assis Meireles;Alan Araújo Vieira;Carolina Roella Costa
Journal FEMS microbiology letters
Year 2011
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342011000100005
Keywords
diagnosis infant diagnóstico sepsis recién nacido newborn enfermeria neonatalnursing

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.