dois estudos sobre o trabalho dos petroleiros

Clicks: 7
ID: 169801
1996
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #57 of 61 articles by views in Neotropical entomology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
O presente artigo traz um resumo de dois estudos realizados na área do petróleo, o primeiro feito em uma unidade de refino e o segundo abarcando o trabalho de operadores exercendo várias funções dentro de uma refinaria e de terminais marítimos de petróleo. Nos dois casos, o ponto central foi a análise da atividade dos trabalhadores, isto é, o que eles faziam e como o faziam para dai conta das exigências de produção que lhes eram atribuídas. No entanto, os métodos utilizados foram diferentes: no primeiro caso utilizou-se a Análise Ergonômica do Trabalho (AET) e no segundo, a Análise Coletiva do Trabalho (ACT). Além de apresentar os principais resultados destes estudos, a autora faz considerações sobre as diferenças entre os dois métodos e um apelo à comunidade científica para que se preocupe mais em estudar a atividade real dos trabalhadores e assim contribuir para um melhor conhecimento do que se passa no interior das unidades produtivas, evitando que sofrimentos humanos inúteis e até catástrofes industriais continuem a ocorrer.
This paper describes two studies about petroleum industry. The first was developed in a refinery and the second focuses on the work of operators in various jobs within a refinery and maritime petroleum units. In both cases, the focal point was the analyses of activities, that is, what the workers do and how they do it in order to meet production demandai put on them. However, two different methods were applied in the studies. Ergonomics Work Analyses (EWA) was used on the first case and Collective Work Analyses (CWA), on the second. Besides showing the main results, the author compares the two methods. She also draws the scientific community attention to the importance of studding the workers actual activity in order to contribute to a better understanding of what is going on inside production units, avoiding useless human suffering, and the still ocurring undustrial disasters.
Reference Key
ferreira1996productiondois Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Leda Leal Ferreira
Journal Neotropical entomology
Year 1996
DOI
10.1590/S0103-65131996000100001
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.