contribution of sublinear and supralinear dendritic integration to neuronal computations

Clicks: 182
ID: 166653
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #229 of 395 articles by views in macromolecular bioscience

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Nonlinear dendritic integration is thought to increase the computational ability of neurons. Most studies focus on how supralinear summation of excitatory synaptic responses arising from clustered inputs within single dendrites result in the enhancement of neuronal firing, enabling simple computations such as feature detection. Recent reports have shown that sublinear summation is also a prominent dendritic operation, extending the range of subthreshold input-output transformations conferred by dendrites. Like supralinear operations, sublinear dendritic operations also increase the repertoire of neuronal computations, but feature extraction requires different synaptic connectivity strategies for each of these operations. In this article we will review the experimental and theoretical findings describing the biophysical determinants of the three primary classes of dendritic operations: linear, sublinear, and supralinear. We then review a Boolean algebra-based analysis of simplified neuron models, which provides insight into how dendritic operations influence neuronal computations. We highlight how neuronal computations are critically dependent on the interplay of dendritic properties (morphology and voltage-gated channel expression), spiking threshold and distribution of synaptic inputs carrying particular sensory features. Finally, we describe how global (scattered) and local (clustered) integration strategies permit the implementation of similar classes of computations, one example being the object feature binding problem.
Reference Key
etran-van-minh2015frontierscontribution Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Alexandra eTran-Van-Minh;Alexandra eTran-Van-Minh;Romain Daniel Cazé;Romain Daniel Cazé;Therese eAbrahamsson;Therese eAbrahamsson;Therese eAbrahamsson;Laurence eCathala;Boris S. Gutkin;Boris S. Gutkin;David A. DiGregorio;David A. DiGregorio
Journal macromolecular bioscience
Year 2015
DOI
10.3389/fncel.2015.00067
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.