decentralisation, decision space and directions for future research; comment on “decentralisation of health services in fiji: a decision space analysis”
Clicks: 152
ID: 166009
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
152 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #47 of 52 articles by views in telematika
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Decentralisation continues to re-appear in health system reform across the world. Evaluation of these reforms
reveals how research on decentralisation continues to evolve. In this paper, we examine the theoretical foundations
and empirical references which underpin current approaches to studying decentralisation in health systems.
| Reference Key |
zahmatkesh2016internationaldecentralisation,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Maryam Zahmatkesh;Mark Exworthy |
| Journal | telematika |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.15171/ijhpm.2016.76
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.