rejoinder to article by harold m shroder: the fallacy of using in-basket based measures for the validation of leadership dimensions

Clicks: 18
ID: 164553
2004
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #97 of 109 articles by views in open access macedonian journal of medical sciences

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
A response is given to the critical questions and concerns raised by Schroder (2004) on the validation study by Spangenberg and Theron (2003). The importance of open debate as an expression of scientific rationally in service of the epistemic ideal of science is acknowledged. Schroder’s (2004) concern essentially centers on the use of the inbasket as a stand-alone measure and the appropriateness of the design of the Spangenberg and Theron (2003) study for the investigation of the validity of the HPLC’s. The objectives of the Spangenberg and Theron (2003) study are re-examined. The prudence of using and validating the in-basket as a stand-alone measure is discussed. Opsomming Repliek word gelewer op die kritise vrae en besorgdhede wat deur Schroder (2004) geopper word oor die validasiestudie van Spangenberg en Theron (2003). Die belang van ’n oop gesprek as manifestasie van die rasionaliteit van wetenskap in diens van die epistemiese ideal word erken. Schroder (2004) se kommer sentreer wesenlik rondom die gebruik van die posmandjie as ‘n meetinstrument in eie reg en die toepaslikheid van die ontwerp van die Spangenberg en Theron (2003) studie vir die validasie van die HPLC’s. Die doelstellings van die Spangenberg en Theron (2003) studie word weer in oënskou geneem. Die wysheid om die posmandjie as ’n meetinstrument in eie reg te gebruik en te valideer word bespreek.
Reference Key
spangenberg2004sarejoinder Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;H. H. Spangenberg;C. C. Theron
Journal open access macedonian journal of medical sciences
Year 2004
DOI
10.4102/sajip.v30i2.149
URL
https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip/article/view/149
Keywords
in-basket based measuresindustrial psychology

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.