Patient Health Information Technology Designed for Shared Decision Making: If We Implement It, Will It Become Normal Clinical Practice?

Clicks: 403
ID: 16000
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 170 articles by views in Studies in health technology and informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 170 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Personal health records designed for shared decision making have the potential to engage patients in self-management decision making. This pre-implementation evaluation was underpinned by Normalization Process Theory and utilized mixed methods to describe the cognitive and behavioral work of implementation, and its potential to integrate into practice. Participants invest in sense-making, commitment and appraisal processes with strong agreement for positive impact on engagement. Future implementation success will depend on a systemic investment of collective action.
Reference Key
davis2019patientstudies Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Davis, Selena;
Journal Studies in health technology and informatics
Year 2019
DOI
10.3233/SHTI190581
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.