otherproof
Clicks: 244
ID: 158030
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
244 views
46 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #18 of 62 articles by views in acta horticulturae
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Delimiting a field of study and fixing a corpus of texts that will serve as the basis for the analysis are not the only tasks facing semiotics. There is another dimension, that of intersubjectivity, which raises interesting problems between the semiotic analyst and his sources of information. That otherness has an ethical framework, whose rigorous compliance depends on the study of a certain matter without falling into stereotypes or deformations. It is therefore a question of overcoming the univocal and exclusive view of the researcher, to give way to the voice of the other, to that symbolic space of dialogue and cultural exchange that enriches perspectives and establishes currents of empathy between the student and his object of study.
| Reference Key |
landowski2016contratextootherproof
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Eric Landowski |
| Journal | acta horticulturae |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.26439/contratexto2016.n026.659
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.