läbirääkimiste modelleerimine arvutil
Clicks: 225
ID: 148597
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
225 views
18 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #42 of 59 articles by views in Journal of food protection
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the paper, a model of negotiation is developed which includes a model of argument. The topic of negotiation between two participants is an action to be performed by one of them. The initial communicative goals of the participants can match or not. In the first case, they are cooperatively looking for reasons why performing (or not performing) the action is useful, pleasant, etc. In the second case, they are involved in debate. They present arguments and counter-arguments and in the end, one of them will abandon his or her initial communicative goal. An analysis of human- human negotiations is carried out in order to give a preliminary evaluation of the introduced model. A limited version of the model is implemented on the computer.
| Reference Key |
koit2015eestilbirkimiste
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Mare Koit |
| Journal | Journal of food protection |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
10.5128/ERYa11.08
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.