concised form for lower urinary tract dysfunction symptom scale in children
Clicks: 11
ID: 146889
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
3.0
/100
11 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #84 of 86 articles by views in JAMA network open
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction: Symptom Scales (SS) are questionnaires for
evaluating and following up of special illnesses. SS used for
the diagnosis and follow-up of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
(LUTD) in children is called LUTD Symptom Scale (LUTDSS).
Aim: Aim of the present study was to identify the questions
which are more important for the diagnosis of LUTD in children
and create a simpler SS.
Materials and Methods: From January 2005 to March 2015,
631 children between the age 5 and 15 were enrolled in this
study. Eleven children with active urinary tract infections were
excluded from the study. Two hundred sixty three children from
the nursery and secondary school saying that they have no
urinary complaints and having LUTDSS <9 were designed as
control group. Three hundred fifty seven children with LUTDSS
score ≥9 were thought as having LUTD and diagnoses were
verified with 3-day bladder diaries and 2-time Uroflow-EMGPVR tests. The answered questions of LUTDSS in patient and
control group were compared.
Results: Children with daytime incontinence (first question of
questionnaire) were 47.7 (4.8-510) times (p=0.01), children with
enuresis (third question) were 59.53 (6.2-961) times (p=0.001),
children with pause while urinating (eighth question) were
28.7 (4.4-2090) times (p=0.001), children with urgency (tenth
question) were 54.7 (29.3-604) times (p=0.039) more likely to
have LUTD than the children not having these complaints. The
area under ROC curve created by using 1,3,8, and 10 questions
was calculated 86.4%.
Conclusion: The diagnosis and control of LUTD can be made
by using only 1., 3., 8. and 10. questions, and these 4 questions
could form simpler SS for LUTD in children.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (112 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
ebiloglu2016journalconcised
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Turgay Ebiloglu;Engin Kaya;Burak Kopru;Giray Ergin;Soykan Sahin;Hasan Cem Irkilata;Yusuf Kibar |
| Journal | JAMA network open |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
10.7860/JCDR/2016/19056.8130
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.