the c(4 × 4)–a(1 × 3) surface reconstruction transition on insb(001): static versus dynamic conditions

Clicks: 147
ID: 142669
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #28 of 46 articles by views in international journal of aerospace engineering

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The transition between the a(1 × 3) and c(4 × 4) surface reconstructions of InSb(001) has been carefully monitored by reflection high energy electron diffraction as a function of temperature and Sb2 flux, without incident In flux. Arrhenius-like behaviour is observed across the whole range of Sb2 fluxes and temperatures, allowing accurate internal calibration of substrate temperature. This behaviour is in contrast to aggregated data obtained under dynamic molecular beam epitaxy conditions, which show two regimes rather than a single Arrhenius-like phase boundary. The results are explained qualitatively by the atomistic kinetics in static versus dynamic conditions.
Reference Key
bomphrey2015resultsthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;J.J. Bomphrey;M.J. Ashwin;T.S. Jones;G.R. Bell
Journal international journal of aerospace engineering
Year 2015
DOI
10.1016/j.rinp.2015.05.004
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.