predictors of malignancy and recommended follow-up for patients with negative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected pancreatic lesions
Clicks: 241
ID: 140366
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
68.6
/100
241 views
197 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #35 of 250 articles by views in indian journal of pharmacology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 250 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) can characterize and diagnose pancreatic lesions as malignant, but cannot definitively rule out the presence of malignancy. Outcome data regarding the length of follow-up in patients with negative or nondiagnostic EUS-FNA of pancreatic lesions are not well-established.
| Reference Key |
spier2009canadianpredictors
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Bret J Spier;Eric A Johnson;Deepak V Gopal;Terrence Frick;Michael M Einstein;Siobhan Byrne;Rebecca L Koscik;Jinn-Ing Liou;Terri Broxmeyer;Suzanne M Selvaggi;Patrick R Pfau |
| Journal | indian journal of pharmacology |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
10.1155/2009/870323
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.