nutritional assessment of hospitalized patients: agreement between different methods
Clicks: 353
ID: 139854
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
78.5
/100
353 views
216 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #12 of 130 articles by views in food research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 130 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the correlation between the nutritional diagnosis by subjective global nutritional assessment (SGA) and that obtained by anthropometric measurements in patients admitted to a public hospital in the city of Fortaleza-CE, Brazil. Methods: Assessment of nutritional status was conducted for all 50 patients who were hospitalized in the period from August to September 2008. Besides measurement of weight, height, arm circumference andtriceps skinfold thickness, SGA form was applied to each patient. Nutritional status was established based on the percentage of appropriateness of each measure and on the scores obtained through the form. Agreement between the diagnoses obtained by the two methodswas assessed using the chi-square test with continuity correction. Results: Study participants were 31 (62%) male patients and 19 (38%) females, aged 37.08 ± 11.92 years. Association was found between nutritional diagnosis through SGA and nutritional diagnosis based onfinal anthropometric evaluation, with statistically significant differences (p = 0.047) between both diagnoses. Conclusion: There may be disagreement concerning nutritional diagnosis when the patient is assessed by different methods.
| Reference Key |
sampaio2012revistanutritional
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Rafaella Maria Monteiro Sampaio;Francisco José Maia Pinto;Cláudia Machado Coelho Souza de Vasconcelos |
| Journal | food research |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.