mudanças nos pesos do cpc e seu impacto nos resultados de avaliação em universidades federais e privadas changes in the weights of the cpc and their impact on results of evaluation in federal and private universities
Clicks: 287
ID: 138695
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
287 views
47 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Desde a implantação do Sistema Nacional de Avaliação da Educação Superior (SINAES), no ano de 2004, o Ministério da Educação (MEC), por meio do Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP), vem promovendo modificações em relação à forma de avaliação dos cursos de graduação brasileiros que incluem a criação de novos conceitos e alterações na composição e nos pesos dos conceitos derivados do Exame Nacional de Desempenho de Estudantes (Enade). Além disso, a transparência na divulgação dos resultados é cada vez maior. Na edição 2008 do Enade, a divulgação detalhada dos resultados permitiu uma análise minuciosa do principal indicador oficial da qualidade dos cursos de graduação brasileiros - o Conceito Preliminar de Curso (CPC). Este trabalho tem por objetivo analisar o efeito das ponderações utilizadas no CPC e, principalmente, examinar o impacto que eventuais mudanças teriam sobre os conceitos de cursos oferecidos por universidades privadas e federais brasileiras.
Since the implementation of the National Higher Education Evaluation System (SINAES), in 2004, the Ministry of Education (MEC) through the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anisio Teixeira (INEP) is promoting changes related to the evaluation of undergraduate programs in Brazil. Such changes include the creation of new concepts and modifications in the composition and in the weights of the concepts derived from the National Student Performance Exam (Enade). Furthermore, transparency in the dissemination of results is increasing. In the 2008 edition of Enade, a detailed disclosure of the results allowed a rigorous analysis of the main official indicator of the quality of undergraduate programs in Brazil, the CPC (Preliminary Program Rating). This paper aims to analyze the effect of the weights used in the CPC, and especially consider the impact that some changes would have on the CPC of programs offered by private and federal universities in Brazil.
Since the implementation of the National Higher Education Evaluation System (SINAES), in 2004, the Ministry of Education (MEC) through the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anisio Teixeira (INEP) is promoting changes related to the evaluation of undergraduate programs in Brazil. Such changes include the creation of new concepts and modifications in the composition and in the weights of the concepts derived from the National Student Performance Exam (Enade). Furthermore, transparency in the dissemination of results is increasing. In the 2008 edition of Enade, a detailed disclosure of the results allowed a rigorous analysis of the main official indicator of the quality of undergraduate programs in Brazil, the CPC (Preliminary Program Rating). This paper aims to analyze the effect of the weights used in the CPC, and especially consider the impact that some changes would have on the CPC of programs offered by private and federal universities in Brazil.
| Reference Key |
bittencourt2010avaliao:mudanas
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Hélio Radke Bittencourt;Lorí Viali;Alziro Cesar de Morais Rodrigues;Alam de Oliveira Casartelli |
| Journal | avaliação: revista da avaliação da educação superior |
| Year | 2010 |
| DOI |
10.1590/S1414-40772010000300008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.