avaliação dos fatores predisponentes nas instabilidades femoropatelares avaliation of predisposing factors in patellofemoral instabilities
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #31 of 45 articles by views in current opinion in food science
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of predisposing factors for femoropatelar instability (dysplasia of the trochlea, high patella, TTTG, and patellar tilt) in a group of patients in outpatient follow-up. METHODS: 70 patients were evaluated; 52 (74.28 %) female and 18 (25.72 %) male, with an average age of 17.71 years and a total of 127 knees. The evaluation by imaging was carried out through radiologic examination and computerized tomography. The femoropatelar instabilities were classified according to Henri Dejour's classification (major, objective and potential instability). The trochlear dysplasia was classified according to David Dejour's classification (type A, B, C, D). RESULTS: Trochlear dysplasia was observed in 118 knees (92.91%), with 91 knees (77.11%) being of type A and B. The average for patellar height was 1.23, with 44 (34.64%) considered high patellas and 83 (65.36%) within the normal range. Abnormal patellae tilt was found in 92 knees (72.44%) and an elevation of TTTG in 63 knees (49.60%). The was a prevalence of objective instabilities with 89 knees (70.07%). In relation to the association of predisposing factors, 117 knees (92.13%) presented more than one factor. CONCLUSIONS: Femoropatelar instability is a multifactorial disease, with trochlear disorders being the most frequent, and there is a strong association between two or more predisposing factors.
| Reference Key |
burmann2011actaavaliao
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | current opinion in food science |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
ZincirX productsfrom the team behind Journament
-
PatentYazar
Patent drafts for the EPO, USPTO and TürkPatent
From inventor notes to a DOCX draft: description, claims, abstract. The machine drafts, the attorney signs.
See how it works (opens in a new tab) -
Projenator
Have a project idea? Score and plan it with AI
AI scores your idea in five dimensions and builds a phased plan. Your first project is free, no card needed.
Start your first project (opens in a new tab)
Cookies
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site and keep you signed in. With your permission we would also use Google Analytics to see how the site is used, and Google AdSense to show ads on journal and article pages. Both stay off unless you accept, and you can change your mind at any time. How we use cookies · KVKK notice (Türkiye)
Cookie settings
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.