Safe injection practices among anesthesia providers: a scoping review protocol.

Clicks: 338
ID: 12256
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #11 of 36 articles by views in jbi database of systematic reviews and implementation reports

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The objective of this review is to identify and map literature related to safe injection practices among anesthesia providers in developed nations. The mapped literature will be used to determine if there is sufficient literature available to pose specific questions that can be valuably addressed, through a future systematic review, to reduce the prevalence of unsafe injections.A safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the healthcare worker to avoidable risk, and does not result in waste that is a danger to the community. The literature is replete with examples of disease outbreaks connected to unsafe injections via the misuse of syringes, needles and medications. Many such outbreaks involve unsafe injections by anesthesia providers.This scoping review will consider any research article or policy document, including unpublished reports, that provides information related to safe injection practices by anesthesia providers in developed nations.For studies published in English from 2000, the databases to be searched include Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL and Google Scholar. The search for unpublished literature will include the websites of anesthesia organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health. Results will be screened by two independent reviewers who will use a standardized tool to independently extract data from each included source. The results of the review will be presented as a map of the data extracted in a tabular form and in a narrative descriptive summary.
Reference Key
adams2019safejbi Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Adams, Julie Lynn;Rust, Daniel Bryan;Anderson, Lori Rae;McShane, Franklin John;
Journal jbi database of systematic reviews and implementation reports
Year 2019
DOI
10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003876
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.