The relationship between the undergraduate clinical learning environment and work readiness in new graduate nurses: A pre-post survey study.

Clicks: 325
ID: 121939
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #23 of 101 articles by views in Nurse education today

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Due to projected nurse shortages, it is necessary that undergraduate programs optimise work readiness outcomes in new graduate nurses. Research that quantitatively evaluates characteristics of clinical nursing programs that predict increased work readiness is required.To explore the relationship between the undergraduate clinical learning environment and nurse perceptions of work readiness prior to and following, commencement as a new graduate nurse.A pre-post follow-up study. Undergraduates were surveyed at the end of their Bachelor's degree (baseline) and at 8-10 weeks after commencement as a graduate nurse (Time 1).A multi-site, metropolitan private hospital in Victoria, Australia.Nursing graduates who completed a university fellowship program (n = 26), or were undertaking their graduate year and had completed placement blocks within (n = 18) or outside (n = 31) the healthcare organisation.Participants self-completed the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) and Work Readiness Scale for Graduate Nurses (WRS-GN) at baseline and Time 1. Multiple regression analyses were performed.CLEI scores significantly predicted work readiness outcomes (all p-values<.05), accounting for 16-36% and 17-28% of the variance of WRS-GN scores at baseline and Time 1, respectively. After adjusting for clustering due to clinical placement groups, CLEI Individualisation (p = .023) and Valuing Nurses Work (p = .01) predicted improved Time 1 WRS-GN Organisational Acumen. CLEI Innovative and Adaptive Culture scores predicted poorer Time 1 Organisational Acumen (p = .001).Learning environments that offered high levels of individualised attention and valued nurses' work appeared to facilitate post-graduation engagement and identification with nursing practice. However, highly innovative and adaptive education may detract from optimal work readiness. Findings revealed that while important, the clinical learning environment only accounted for a small-to-moderate degree of nursing graduates' work readiness. To facilitate robust evidence-based improvement of clinical nursing education, future research should attempt to empirically establish the value of additional facilitators of work readiness.
Reference Key
dudley2020thenurse Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dudley, Mietta;Khaw, Damien;Botti, Mari;Hutchinson, Anastasia F;
Journal Nurse education today
Year 2020
DOI
S0260-6917(20)31437-4
URL
Keywords
health workforce clinical learning environment follow-up studies nursing education research graduate nursing education self report work preparedness work readiness

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.