Surgical Decisions Based on a Balance between Malignancy Probability and Surgical Risk in Patients with Branch and Mixed-Type Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm

Clicks: 478
ID: 118260
2020
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #13 of 253 articles by views in journal of clinical medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 253 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Objective: To propose a decision tool considering both malignancy probability and surgical risk for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Background Data Summary: Surgical risk and malignancy probability are both critical factors in making decisions about surgical resection of IPMN. Methods: We included 800 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for branch duct and mixed-type IPMN (April 1995 to June 2018). A nomogram was used to obtain the malignancy probability (MP-N). The surgical risks were estimated as the postoperative complication rate and serious complication from the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator (SC-ACS NSQIP). The risk–benefit analysis was conducted in two ways: calculation of the cutoff value of MP-N using the complication rate and directly comparing the MP-N and SC-ACS NSQIP results. Results: The optimal cutoff value of MP-N was 32% and 21% in the pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) groups, respectively, when using the major complication rate (Clavien grades III over). When we applied the optimal cutoff value to the two surgical methods, surgery was reduced by 51.7% in the PD group and 56% in the DP group, and the AUC value of the malignant predictions were 0.7126 and 0.7615, respectively. According to the direct comparison of MP-N and SC-ACS NSQIP, surgery was reduced by 31.7%, and the AUC value of malignant prediction was 0.6588. Conclusion: Our risk–benefit analysis model considering both malignancy probability and surgical risk is relatively acceptable, and it may help surgeons and patients make treatment decisions for a disease with a broad spectrum of malignancy rates.
Reference Key
lee2020journalsurgical Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Seung Jae Lee;Seo Young Park;Dae Wook Hwang;Jae Hoon Lee;Ki Byung Song;Woohyung Lee;Jaewoo Kwon;Yejong Park;Song Cheol Kim;Lee, Seung Jae;Park, Seo Young;Hwang, Dae Wook;Lee, Jae Hoon;Song, Ki Byung;Lee, Woohyung;Kwon, Jaewoo;Park, Yejong;Kim, Song Cheol;
Journal journal of clinical medicine
Year 2020
DOI
10.3390/jcm9092758
URL
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/9/2758
Keywords
nomograms balance intraductal papillary neoplasm of the pancreas malignancy prediction acs nsqip surgical risk calculator

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.