Evaluating containment effectiveness of A2 and B2 biological safety cabinets.

Clicks: 225
ID: 11826
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #17 of 143 articles by views in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 143 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This study investigates the use of a canopy-connected recirculating class II type A2 biological safety cabinet (BSC) as an alternative to the B2 when preparing volatile, sterile compounded preparations. Selection of the appropriate BSC for processes that use subgram levels of volatile chemicals is difficult due to a lack of quantitative containment evidence by cabinet type. There is a perception that hazardous compounding must be done in a B2 cabinet due to the potential for vapors, and this study seeks to challenge that perception.In total, 5 tests, 3 prequalification tests and 2 containment capability tests, were conducted on a single cabinet of each type at sterile compounding pharmacies. Prequalification tests were performed to verify that each BSC was operating properly. Each cabinet was certified to NSF-ANSI 49-2016, particle counted per ISO 14644-1:1999, and subjected to a qualitative video smoke study. Once these tests confirmed the expected working conditions, 2 containment capability tests were conducted. The containment testing included tracer gas testing per ASHRAE 110:2016 section 8.1.1 through 8.1.13, and cyclophosphamide sampling during sterile compounding of the drug material.Both cabinets passed all the prequalification tests. During the ASHRAE tracer gas testing the A2 cabinet was able to contain a tracer gas 92% to 160% as effectively as the B2 cabinet depending on the position of the gas ejection. During sterile compounding the airborne cyclophosphamide sampling captured samples of less than 1.0 ng at all locations for both the A2 and B2 cabinets.The data generated from this study demonstrate that use of an A2 for hazardous compounding can provide a comparable level of safety for the environment, users, and product while having less stringent airflow requirements relative to a B2. The simpler requirements for an A2 make them an appealing alternative as they have the potential to reduce the overall operating costs associated with a compounding pharmacy while maintaining safe levels of containment.
Reference Key
taylor2019evaluatingamerican Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Taylor, Alex V;Baker, Nicholas;Hulsey, Morgan;Bennett, Corbin C;Meiners, Matthew;Gonzales, Ben A;
Journal American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Year 2019
DOI
10.1093/ajhp/zxz030
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.