External Validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT Scanning in Patients With Minor Head Injury
Clicks: 281
ID: 118254
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
281 views
41 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #79 of 149 articles by views in JAMA
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 149 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Context Two decision rules for indications of computed tomography (CT) in patients with minor head injury, the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) and the New Orleans Criteria (NOC), suggest that CT scanning may be restricted to patients with certain risk factors, which would lead to important reductions in the use...
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (50 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
smits2005jamaexternal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Marion Smits;Diederik W. J. Dippel;Gijs G. de Haan;Heleen M. Dekker;Pieter E. Vos;Digna R. Kool;Paul J. Nederkoorn;Paul A. M. Hofman;Albert Twijnstra;Hervé L. J. Tanghe;M. G. Myriam Hunink; |
| Journal | JAMA |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.