Column Integrated Water Vapor and Aerosol Load Characterization with the New ZEN-R52 Radiometer

Clicks: 288
ID: 118075
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #72 of 170 articles by views in remote sensing

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 170 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The study shows the first results of the column-integrated water vapor retrieved by the new ZEN-R52 radiometer. This new radiometer has been specifically designed to monitor aerosols and atmospheric water vapor with a high degree of autonomy and robustness in order to allow the expansion of the observations of these parameters to remote desert areas from ground-based platforms. The ZEN-R52 device shows substantial improvements compared to the previous ZEN-R41 prototype: a smaller field of view, an increased signal-to-noise ratio, better stray light rejection, and an additional channel (940 nm) for precipitable water vapor (PWV) retrieval. PWV is inferred from the ZEN-R52 Zenith Sky Radiance (ZSR) measurements using a lookup table (LUT) methodology. The improvement of the new ZEN-R52 in terms of ZSR was verified by means of a comparison with the ZEN-R41, and with the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Cimel CE318 (CE318-AERONET) at Izaña Observatory, a Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) high mountain station (Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain), over a 10-month period (August 2017 to June 2018). ZEN-R52 aerosol optical depth (AOD) was extracted by means of the ZEN–AOD–LUT method with an uncertainty of ±0.01 ± 0.13*AOD. ZEN-R52 PWV extracted using a new LUT technique was compared with quasi-simultaneous (±30 s) Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer measurements as reference. A good agreement was found between the two instruments (PWV means a relative difference of 9.1% and an uncertainty of ±0.089 cm or ±0.036 + 0.061*PWV for PWV <1 cm). This comparison analysis was extended using two PWV datasets from the same CE318 reference instrument at Izaña Observatory: one obtained from AERONET (CE318-AERONET), and another one using a specific calibration of the 940-nm channel performed in this work at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center Observatory (CE318-IARC), which improves the PWV product.
Reference Key
almansa2020remotecolumn Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Antonio Fernando Almansa;Emilio Cuevas;África Barreto;Benjamín Torres;Omaira Elena García;Rosa Delia García;Cristian Velasco-Merino;Victoria Eugenia Cachorro;Alberto Berjón;Manuel Mallorquín;César López;Ramón Ramos;Carmen Guirado-Fuentes;Ramón Negrillo;Ángel Máximo de Frutos;Almansa, Antonio Fernando;Cuevas, Emilio;Barreto, África;Torres, Benjamín;García, Omaira Elena;Delia García, Rosa;Velasco-Merino, Cristian;Cachorro, Victoria Eugenia;Berjón, Alberto;Mallorquín, Manuel;López, César;Ramos, Ramón;Guirado-Fuentes, Carmen;Negrillo, Ramón;de Frutos, Ángel Máximo;
Journal remote sensing
Year 2020
DOI
10.3390/rs12091424
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.