Systematic Review of Curriculum-Based Measurement with Students Who Are Deaf
Clicks: 130
ID: 116591
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
2.7
/100
9 views
9 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Abstract. This review systematically identified and compared the technical adequacy (reliability and validity evidence) of reading curriculum-based measurement
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (18 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
athesystematic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lam, Elizabeth A;McMaster, Kristen L;Rose, Susan; |
| Journal | the journal of deaf studies and deaf education |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.