Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys
Clicks: 218
ID: 116175
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.9
/100
13 views
13 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Cluster trials are becoming more frequent and reporting is of higher quality. Perhaps statistician pressure works.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (16 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
jm2004bmccluster
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bland JM;; |
| Journal | BMC medical research methodology |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
periodicals as topic / standards
bias
pmid:15310402
pmc515302
doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-21
j martin bland
bibliometrics*
cluster analysis*
periodicals as topic / statistics & numerical data*
randomized controlled trials as topic / methods*
randomized controlled trials as topic / standards
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.