What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?
Clicks: 285
ID: 114193
2008
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
80.1
/100
277 views
225 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Guideline developers use a bewildering variety of systems to rate the quality of the evidence underlying their recommendations. Some are facile, some confused, and others sophisticated but complex
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (28 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
gh2008bmjwhat
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Guyatt GH;Oxman AD;Kunz R;Vist GE;Falck-Ytter Y;Schünemann HJ; ;; |
| Journal | BMJ |
| Year | 2008 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
QUALITY ASSURANCE
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
Health Care
review
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
reproducibility of results
outcome assessment
publication bias
gordon h guyatt
andrew d oxman
grade working group
evidence-based medicine*
pmid:18456631
pmc2364804
doi:10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be
practice guidelines as topic / standards*
quality indicators
research design / standards
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.