What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

Clicks: 383
ID: 114193
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #21 of 225 articles by views in BMJ

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 225 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Guideline developers use a bewildering variety of systems to rate the quality of the evidence underlying their recommendations. Some are facile, some confused, and others sophisticated but complex
Reference Key
gh2008bmjwhat Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Guyatt GH;Oxman AD;Kunz R;Vist GE;Falck-Ytter Y;Schünemann HJ; ;;
Journal BMJ
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18456631
Keywords
QUALITY ASSURANCE National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE Health Care review pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine reproducibility of results outcome assessment publication bias gordon h guyatt andrew d oxman grade working group evidence-based medicine* pmid:18456631 pmc2364804 doi:10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be practice guidelines as topic / standards* quality indicators research design / standards

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.