Anthrax as a Biological Weapon: Medical and Public Health Management

Clicks: 295
ID: 114185
1999
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #73 of 149 articles by views in JAMA

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 149 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Objective To develop consensus-based recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals following the use of anthrax as a biological weapon against a civilian population. Participants The working group included 21 representatives from staff of major academic medical centers and research, government, military, public health, and...
Reference Key
inglesby1999jamaanthrax Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Thomas V. Inglesby;Donald A. Henderson;John G. Bartlett;Michael S. Ascher;Edward Eitzen;Arthur M. Friedlander;Jerome Hauer;Joseph McDade;Michael T. Osterholm;Tara O'Toole;Gerald Parker;Trish M. Perl;Philip K. Russell;Kevin Tonat;for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense;
Journal JAMA
Year 1999
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.