Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys
Clicks: 255
ID: 113029
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
74.7
/100
246 views
203 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Several reviews of published cluster randomised trials have reported that about half did not take clustering into account in the analysis, which was thus incorrect and potentially misleading. In this paper I ask whether cluster randomised trials are increasing in both number and quality of reporting. Computer search for papers on cluster randomised trials since 1980, hand search of trial reports published in selected volumes of the British Medical Journal over 20 years. There has been a large increase in the numbers of methodological papers and of trial reports using the term 'cluster random' in recent years, with about equal numbers of each type of paper. The British Medical Journal contained more such reports than any other journal. In this journal there was a corresponding increase over time in the number of trials where subjects were randomised in clusters. In 2003 all reports showed awareness of the need to allow for clustering in the analysis. In 1993 and before clustering was ignored in most such trials. Cluster trials are becoming more frequent and reporting is of higher quality. Perhaps statistician pressure works.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (178 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
bland2004bmccluster
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | J Martin Bland;J Martin Bland; |
| Journal | BMC medical research methodology |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-21
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
medicine
Health Sciences
theory of medicine/bioethics
statistical theory and methods
statistics for life sciences
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
periodicals as topic / standards
bias
pmid:15310402
pmc515302
doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-21
j martin bland
bibliometrics*
cluster analysis*
periodicals as topic / statistics & numerical data*
randomized controlled trials as topic / methods*
randomized controlled trials as topic / standards
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.