Estimating Forest Stock Volume in Hunan Province, China, by Integrating In Situ Plot Data, Sentinel-2 Images, and Linear and Machine Learning Regression Models
Clicks: 319
ID: 112918
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.2
/100
319 views
61 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #45 of 170 articles by views in remote sensing
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 170 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The forest stock volume (FSV) is one of the key indicators in forestry resource assessments on local, regional, and national scales. To date, scaling up in situ plot-scale measurements across landscapes is still a great challenge in the estimation of FSVs. In this study, Sentinel-2 imagery, the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud computing platform, three base station joint differential positioning technology (TBSJDPT), and three algorithms were used to build an FSV model for forests located in Hunan Province, southern China. The GEE cloud computing platform was used to extract the imagery variables from the Sentinel-2 imagery pixels. The TBSJDPT was put forward and used to provide high-precision positions of the sample plot data. The random forests (RF), support vector regression (SVR), and multiple linear regression (MLR) algorithms were used to estimate the FSV. For each pixel, 24 variables were extracted from the Sentinel-2 images taken in 2017 and 2018. The RF model performed the best in both the training phase (i.e., R2 = 0.91, RMSE = 35.13 m3 ha−1, n = 321) and in the test phase (i.e., R2 = 0.58, RMSE = 65.03 m3 ha−1, and n = 138). This model was followed by the SVR model (R2 = 0.54, RMSE = 65.60 m3 ha−1, n = 321 in training; R2 = 0.54, RMSE = 66.00 m3 ha−1, n = 138 in testing), which was slightly better than the MLR model (R2 = 0.38, RMSE = 75.74 m3 ha−1, and n = 321 in training; R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 70.22 m3 ha−1, and n = 138 in testing) in both the training phase and test phase. The best predictive band was Red-Edge 1 (B5), which performed well both in the machine learning methods and in the MLR method. The Blue band (B2), Green band (B3), Red band (B4), SWIR2 band (B12), and vegetation indices (TCW, NDVI_B5, and TCB) were used in the machine learning models, and only one vegetation index (MSI) was used in the MLR model. We mapped the FSV distribution in Hunan Province (3.50 × 108 m3) based on the RF model; it reached a total accuracy of 63.87% compared with the official forest report in 2017 (5.48 × 108 m3). The results from this study will help develop and improve satellite-based methods to estimate FSVs on local, regional and national scales.
| Reference Key |
hu2020remoteestimating
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Yang Hu;Xuelei Xu;Fayun Wu;Zhongqiu Sun;Haoming Xia;Qingmin Meng;Wenli Huang;Hua Zhou;Jinping Gao;Weitao Li;Daoli Peng;Xiangming Xiao;Hu, Yang;Xu, Xuelei;Wu, Fayun;Sun, Zhongqiu;Xia, Haoming;Meng, Qingmin;Huang, Wenli;Zhou, Hua;Gao, Jinping;Li, Weitao;Peng, Daoli;Xiao, Xiangming; |
| Journal | remote sensing |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.3390/rs12010186
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.