Life cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials: State of the art and strategies to overcome existing gaps
Clicks: 194
ID: 112500
2012
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
30.0
/100
194 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #239 of 379 articles by views in science of the total environment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 379 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The use of engineered nanomaterials offers advantages as well as disadvantages from a sustainability perspective. It is important to identify such poiâ¦
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (22 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
2012sciencelife
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Journal | science of the total environment |
| Year | 2012 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.