Comparing IS6110-RFLP, PGRS-RFLP and IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR methods for genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.

Clicks: 315
ID: 104741
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #19 of 185 articles by views in Journal of applied microbiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 185 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is still an important disease in the world, especially in developing countries. Applying efficient and suitable methods for genotyping Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates is a crucial step for identifying the MTB transmission mode and controlling its subsequent outcomes. Considering the complexity of IS6110-RFLP and PGRS-RFLP methods for MTB classification, suggesting other simple but reliable techniques could be helpful in the MTB studies, especially in low-income countries.This study aimed to evaluate the capabilities of three methods for genotyping MTB isolates collected from Iran through comparing our previously published results for IS6110-RFLP and PGRS-RFLP methods and current results obtained from IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR technique. A strong concordance was observed between the results of clustering by three techniques. Calculated Kendall's Tau concordance value for correlation of IS6110-RFLP and IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR, for IS6110-RFLP and PGRS-RFLP, and for IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR and PGRS-RFLP techniques was equal to 0.943, 0.898 and 0.85 respectively.A strong correlation between IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR, and IS6110-RFLP and PGRS-RFLP methods was observed and therefore IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR discriminates MTBs capably.The study showed that IS6110-Mtb1/Mtb2 PCR, which is a simple and economical MTB genotyping approach, could be a more appropriate method to be applied in the low-budget research programs.
Reference Key
ansarin2020comparingjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ansarin, Khalil;Sahebi, Leyla;Aftabi, Younes;Khalili, Majid;Seyyedi, Maryam;
Journal Journal of applied microbiology
Year 2020
DOI
10.1111/jam.14676
URL
Keywords
detection diversity molecular epidemiology genotyping mycobacteria

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.