evaluation of development in indirect determination of milk fat free fatty acids in czech republic
Clicks: 187
ID: 163769
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
1 views
1 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Free fatty acids (FFAs) in fat are important indicator of raw milk quality. Result reliability of FFAs is important. Aim was to verify MIRâFT (mid infrared spectroscopy with Fourierâs transformations) method for its calibration to determine FFAs, time stability of MIRâFT FFA calibration and calibration levelling in laboratory networks. Reference (RE) milk samples (1 set = 8) were prepared according to CSN 57â0533 (FFAs in mmol.100gâ1 of fat). MIRâFT instruments were: 1 LactoScope FTIR (DE); 2 Bentley FTS (BE); 2 MilkoScan FT 6000 (FO). 3 calibrations of MIRâFT (5) in 3 laboratories were performed. Bulk milk samples came from 4 herds and 2 breeds. These 4 samples were used for calibration in native and modified form. Modification increased FFAs by cca 100%. Calibration set had 8 samples. 1 between calibration interval was checked monthly by proficiency testing (PT). PT set had 10 samples. 5 samples were with native milk and 5 had modified fat content, lower and higher. Maximal value of difference variability for calibration quality validation is x (sd of difference MIRâFT and RE) plus 1.64 multiple of sd (on 95% level), 1.0613 mmol.100gâ1. Mean validation correlation coefficient (r) between MIRâFT and RE results was 0.802 Âą 0.082 (P < 0.001), from 0.666 to 0.945. Minimal value at calibration is x minus 1.64 multiple of sd (0.668). Correlations between MIRâFT results were higher by 8.4% (0.869 (P < 0.001) > 0.802). Example PT with 10 and 5 milk samples had similar results of r 0.887 and 0.953 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). There is possibility to construct a levelling programme for calibrated instruments. Some equation between PT reference and instrumental values could correct MIRâFT results for their better comparability.Reference Key |
hanu2013actaevaluation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | ;Oto HanuĹĄ;Eva SamkovĂĄ;Jan ĹĂha;Marcela VyletÄlovĂĄ KlimeĹĄovĂĄ;Petr Roubal |
Journal | Talanta |
Year | 2013 |
DOI | 10.11118/actaun201361061669 |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.