النقرات: 309
المعرّف: 154588
مقاييس جودة وأداء المقال
الجودة الإجمالية
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
تقييم الجودة بالذكاء الاصطناعي
لم يتم التحليل
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #40 of 272 articles by views in mobile information systems

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 272 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
الملخص
Abstract INTRODUCTION: A Zika virus epidemic was registered in 2015 in Northeast Brazil. In the State of Pernambuco, thousands of classical cases transpired, and in the following months, neurological disturbances in adults and microcephaly in newborns emerged as complications. After the peak of the epidemic, the official system reported only four cases of Zika virus but over 100,000 cases of dengue virus. The vigilance system was unable to retrospectively estimate cases or to issue an alert to officially notified cases with possible inconsistence concerning specific arbovirosis diagnoses. METHODS: To evaluate the frequency of different arbovirosis diagnoses based on clinical-epidemiologic criteria, from January to April 2015, we conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study retrospectively analyzing suspected cases of arbovirosis. RESULTS: Of 1 , 046 total suspected cases of arbovirus, 895 (86%) were classified as probable Zika virus cases, and 151 (14%) as probable dengue virus cases. The most frequent manifestations in probable Zika virus cases were exanthema (100%), pruritus (50.7%), fever (20.4%) and arthralgia (27.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the official data, during the peak months of the arbovirosis epidemic of 2015, most cases were compatible with Zika virus infections. Hospital-based studies, although retrospective and based on secondary data from clinical files, might provide a better estimate of the number of cases relative to currently available data, if derived from several urgent care units of representative areas of a city or state.This would partially retrospectively correct some inconsistences regarding official notifications.
المفتاح المرجعي
britorevistazika استخدم هذا المفتاح للاستشهاد التلقائي في المخطوطة أثناء استخدام مدير المخطوطات أو مدير الأطروحات من SciMatic
المؤلفون ;Carlos Alexandre Antunes de Brito;Cecilia Coelho Moraes de Brito;Augusto César Oliveira;Marilia Rocha;Caio Atanásio;Carolina Asfora;Júlio Dourado Matos;Anton Saraiva Lima;Maria Fátima Militão Albuquerque
مجلة mobile information systems
السنة السنة غير موجودة
DOI
10.1590/0037-8682-0245-2016
URL
الكلمات المفتاحية

الاستشهادات

لم يتم العثور على استشهادات. لإضافة استشهاد، تواصل مع المشرف على info@scimatic.org

لا توجد تعليقات بعد. كن أول من يعلق على هذا المقال.