Journal of pharmacological sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#36 / 33,622
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
48.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
86
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Journal of pharmacological sciences

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name J Pharmacol Sci
Abbreviated Name j pharmacol sci
ISSN 1347-8648
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (499 total)

2013
Effect of Overexpression of the Brain-Specific Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger Splice Variant NCX1.5 on NO Cytotoxicity in HEK293 Cells
Ota, Yuki;Kawanai, Takuya;Watanabe, Ryo;Nishimura, Akira;Ago, Yukio;Takuma, Kazuhiro;Matsuda, Toshio;
Vol. 121 , No. 4 , pp. 351-354
415 views Abstract
2019
Prediction of irinotecan toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients based on machine learning models with pharmacokinetic parameters
Oyaga-Iriarte, Esther;Insausti, Asier;Sayar, Onintza;Aldaz, Azucena;
Vol. 140 , No. 1 , pp. 20-25
404 views Abstract
2020
detection of aquatic plants using multispectral uav imagery and vegetation index
;Bonggeun Song;Kyunghun Park
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 387-
360 views DOI Abstract
2018
fusion of landsat-8/oli and goci data for hourly mapping of suspended particulate matter at high spatial resolution: a case study in the yangtze (changjiang) estuary
;Yanqun Pan;Fang Shen;Xiaodao Wei
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 158-
344 views DOI Abstract
2015
Sitagliptin alleviated myocardial remodeling of the left ventricle and improved cardiac diastolic dysfunction in diabetic rats.
Liu, Yu-Sheng;Huang, Zhi-Wei;Wang, Lin;Liu, Xin-Xin;Wang, Yong-Mei;Zhang, Yun;Zhang, Mei;
Vol. 127 , No. 3 , pp. 260-74
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization of binding of antipsychotics to muscarinic receptors using mouse cerebral cortex.
Obara, Keisuke;Horiguchi, Saki;Shimada, Toma;Ikarashi, Takumi;Yamaki, Fumiko;Matsuo, Kazuhiro;Yoshio, Takashi;Tanaka, Yoshio;
332 views DOI Abstract
2009
Morphine, Oxycodone, and Fentanyl Exhibit Different Analgesic Profiles in Mouse Pain Models#
Minami, Kazuhisa;Hasegawa, Minoru;Ito, Hisanori;Nakamura, Atsushi;Tomii, Takako;Matsumoto, Mitsunobu;Orita, Satoshi;Matsushima, Syuichi;Miyoshi, Takako;Masuno, Koichi;Torii, Mikinori;Koike, Katsumi;Shimada, Shinji;Kanemasa, Toshiyuki;Kihara, Tsuyoshi;Narita, Minoru;Suzuki, Tsutomu;Kato, Akira;
Vol. 111 , No. 1 , pp. 60-72
320 views Abstract
2010
Internalization of Constitutively Active N111G Mutant of AT1 Receptor Induced by Angiotensin II–Receptor Antagonists Candesartan, Losartan, and Telmisartan: Comparison With Valsartan
Bhuiyan, Mohiuddin Ahmed;Hossain, Murad;Nakamura, Takashi;Ozaki, Masanobu;Nagatomo, Takafumi;
Vol. 112 , No. 4 , pp. 459-462
315 views Abstract
2018
a cloud-based multi-temporal ensemble classifier to map smallholder farming systems
;Rosa Aguilar;Raul Zurita-Milla;Emma Izquierdo-Verdiguier;Rolf A. de By
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 729-
313 views DOI Abstract
2012
detecting mountain peaks and delineating their shapes using digital elevation models, remote sensing and geographic information systems using autometric methodological procedures
;Tomaž Podobnikar
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 784-809
303 views DOI Abstract
View All 499 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
86
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

48.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

86.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.