minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: a comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty

Клики: 605
ID: 131266
2009
Бесплатный PDF
Метрики качества и эффективности статьи
Общее качество
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Оценка качества ИИ
Не проанализировано
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #2 of 39 articles by views in interventions

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Аннотация
Objective: To evaluate the role of nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty and percutaneous endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with low volume renal pelvis. Material and Methods: Retrospective acquired data of 34 patients of laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty was compared with 26 patients of UPJO with pelvic volume less than 50 ml undergoing antegrade endopyelotomy and analyzed for clinical parameters, operative outcomes and success of procedures. All patients were followed up clinically and with diuretic renogram at regular intervals. Results: Mean age, renal pelvic volume and preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 25 years, 43.6 ml and 42.5 ml/min, respectively in endopyelotomy group and 21 years, 34.4 ml and 39.9 ml/min, respectively in laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Mean operative time, postoperative analgesic requirement and mean hospital stay was 100min, 250 mg and 4 days, respectively in endopyelotomy group and 210 min, 300 mg and 4 days, respectively in laparoscopic pyeloplasty group. Only operative time was significantly different between two groups (P < 0.05). Mean follow-up was 36 and 39 months and success rates were 91.2% and 88.8% in laparoscopy and endopyelotomy group, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant complication was seen in endopyelotomy group while two patients had hematuria (one requiring blood transfusion) and three had increased drain output for more than 3 days in laparoscopy group. Conclusion: Percutaneous endopyelotomy is associated with significantly less operative time and postoperative complication rate and provides equivalent success in comparison to nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with UPJO and low volume pelvis. It can be a preferred minimally invasive treatment modality for such patients.
Ссылочный ключ
singh2009indianminimal Используйте этот ключ для автоцитирования в рукописи при использовании SciMatic Manuscript Manager или Thesis Manager
Авторы ;Pratipal Singh;Paresh Jain;Anand Dharaskar;Anil Mandhani;Deepak Dubey;Rakesh Kapoor;Anant Kumar;Aneesh Srivastava
Журнал interventions
Год 2009
DOI
10.4103/0970-1591.45540
URL
http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2009;volume=25;issue=1;spage=68;epage=71;aulast=Singh
Ключевые слова
laparoscopy urology

Цитирования

Цитирования не найдены. Чтобы добавить цитирование, свяжитесь с администратором по адресу info@scimatic.org

Комментарии

Комментариев пока нет. Будьте первым, кто прокомментирует эту статью.