Nanoscale | Journament

Journal Ranking

#34 / 33,622
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
48.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
86
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Nanoscale

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Nanoscale
Abbreviated Name nanoscale
ISSN 2040-3372
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (106 total)

2019
Porous diatomite-mixed 1,4,5,8-NTCDA nanowires as high-performance electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries.
Xu, Yong;Chen, Jun;Xiao, Ze'en;Ou, Caixia;Lv, Weixia;Tao, Lihong;Zhong, Shengwen;
Vol. 11 , No. 34 , pp. 15881-15891
427 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scalable synthesis of colloidal CsPbBr perovskite nanocrystals with high reaction yields through solvent and ligand engineering.
Ng, Chun Kiu;Yin, Wenping;Li, Hanchen;Jasieniak, Jacek J;
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
High strength and ductility of graphene-like carbon nanosheet/copper composites fabricated directly from commercial oleic acid coated copper powders.
Yang, Ziyue;Wang, Lidong;Cui, Ye;Shi, Zhendong;Wang, Miao;Fei, Weidong;
Vol. 10 , No. 36 , pp. 16990-16995
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Capacitive behaviour of nanocrystalline octacalcium phosphate (OCP) (CaH(PO)·5HO) as an electrode material for supercapacitors: biosupercaps.
Tuncer, Mustafa;Bakan, Feray;Gocmez, Hasan;Erdem, Emre;
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mimicking the bioelectrocatalytic function of recombinant CotA laccase through electrostatically self-assembled bioconjugates.
Alba-Molina, David;Rodríguez-Padrón, Daily;Puente-Santiago, Alain R;Giner-Casares, Juan J;Martín-Romero, María T;Camacho, Luis;Martins, Lígia O;Muñoz-Batista, Mario J;Cano, Manuel;Luque, Rafael;
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis of BiTiO decussated nanoplates with enhanced piezocatalytic activity.
Wu, Jiang;Qin, Ni;Lin, Enzhu;Yuan, Baowei;Kang, Zihan;Bao, Dinghua;
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Copper-based homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts for electrochemical water oxidation.
Lee, Husileng;Wu, Xiujuan;Sun, Licheng;
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glioma-targeted dual functionalized thermosensitive Ferri-liposomes for drug delivery through an in vitro blood-brain barrier.
Shi, Di;Mi, Gujie;Shen, Yan;Webster, Thomas J;
Vol. 11 , No. 32 , pp. 15057-15071
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
The application of nanotechnology in enhancing immunotherapy for cancer treatment: current effects and perspective.
Li, Yongjiang;Ayala-Orozco, Ciceron;Rauta, Pradipta Ranjan;Krishnan, Sunil;
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Graphitic carbon nitride-based nanocomposites and their biological applications: a review.
Chan, Ming-Hsien;Liu, Ru-Shi;Hsiao, Michael;
Vol. 11 , No. 32 , pp. 14993-15003
335 views DOI Abstract
View All 106 Articles
49
Overall
Below Average
86
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

48.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

86.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.